DP9

A blog produced by the Oregon Justice Resource Center discussing the death penalty (capital punishment) in Oregon and in the Ninth Circuit.

Idaho Update (4/10/12)

From the Republic, 4 death row inmates sue over Idaho’s newest lethal injection procedures

BOISE, Idaho — Four inmates on Idaho’s death row are suing the state, contending Idaho’s new execution procedures give too much power to prison officials, create a risk of severe pain and would allow unqualified workers to carry out medical procedures. The lawsuit, filed in Boise’s U.S. District Court late last week, asks a judge to stop all executions until the problems are fixed.

The lawsuit against the Idaho Department of Correction’s Director Brent Reinke, Operations Division Chief Kevin Kempf and other department officials comes as the men prepare for the possibility of an execution sometime in late spring or early summer. Richard Leavitt, convicted of the brutal 1984 stabbing death of Danette Jean Elg in Blackfoot, is waiting to see if the U.S. Supreme Court will consider his case. If the high court refuses, Leavitt could be the next inmate to enter the lethal injection chamber at the Idaho Maximum Security Institution.

Leavitt is joined in the lawsuit by fellow condemned inmates Thomas Creech, James Hairston and Gene Stuart. All four men are represented by the Federal Public Defender’s office.

In the 37-page lawsuit, the inmates take issue with Idaho’s newest version of the execution policy, adopted by the department earlier this year.

The new policy allows the state to use either a three-drug mixture for lethal injections, or to opt to use just one drug. It also changed the name of the team that administers the lethal injection from “injection team” to “medical team” and limited the legal ramifications for health professionals involved with executions.

It also can be changed at any time, under the sole discretion of one of two IDOC officials, without any notice to death row inmates or their attorneys. If unforeseen developments occur during an execution, Director Brent Reinke or Idaho Maximum Security Institution Warden Randy Blades can determine how to respond without any constraints on their discretion.

That gives too much power to the IDOC officials, the inmates contend, and violates the inmates’ right to due process.

“Executing any plaintiff without notice of the procedures to be used denies each plaintiff the right to a reasonable opportunity to review and to be heard, in violation of the right to due process,” attorney Oliver Loewy wrote on behalf of inmates in the lawsuit.

The lawsuit also takes issue with the way Idaho officials might obtain the drugs used in lethal injection execution, with the inmates contending that the drugs would likely be illegally obtained or adulterated in some way.

The new protocol doesn’t require that members of the medical team have current professional experience inserting or maintaining IVs on a regular basis, the inmates claim, nor does it require that they have any experience or training in preparing chemicals for injection.

That creates the possibility of error, and extreme pain for the condemned, the inmates claim.

The state has not yet filed a response to the lawsuit.

Read more:

About these ads

Number of People Executed in 2013

12 (as of 5/15/13)

Number of People Executed Since 1976

U.S.
1,332

Ninth Circuit States
71 (5.25%)

Number of People on Death Row in Ninth Circuit States (As of April, 2012)

Number of People on Death Row in Ninth Circuit States (As of October 1st, 2012)

Sourced total U.S. number from NAACP LDF, October 1, 2012.

994 (31.6% of U.S. death row population: 3,148)

Race of Defendant:
White: 426 (42.8%)
Black: 317 (31.9%)
Latino: 200 (20.1%)
Native American: 4 (0.4%)
Asian: 26 (2.6%)
Unknown: 21 (2.1%)

Gender:
Male: 970 (97.6%)
Female: 24 (2.4%)

Twitter

Disclaimer

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. Please do not send any confidential information to the Oregon Justice Resource Center until you have received written acceptance from the Oregon Justice Resource Center of any legal services of any legal services you may request. Please do not reveal, discuss, or post any information about your case or legal problems in the comments section or any where else on this blog. Any communication with the Oregon Justice Resource Center through this blog does not create an attorney client relationship and your communications are not protected.

The owners of this blog reserve the right to delete any comment or post at any time for any reason. This blog is maintained by the Oregon Justice Resource Center and unless it is explicitly stated otherwise, this blog expresses only the views and opinions of the Oregon Justice Resource Center.

For more information visit our website: http://ojrc.org/

%d bloggers like this: