DP9

A blog produced by the Oregon Justice Resource Center discussing the death penalty (capital punishment) in Oregon and in the Ninth Circuit.

Arizona update (5/2/12)

From AZCentral Halt to execution sought over inconsistent procedures

Attorneys for an Arizona prisoner who is scheduled to die later this month on Tuesday asked for a preliminary injunction against his execution because the state Department of Corrections repeatedly varies from its own policies in carrying out death sentences.

Samuel Lopez is scheduled to be executed on May 16 for the murder of a Phoenix woman in 1987.

Similar arguments were knocked down in U.S. District Court last December and again in February. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals weighed in on the February case and put Corrections Department lawyers on notice, though the court allowed two executions to go forward. A third execution since then was carried out in April.

AdTech Ad

The argument has swirled since 2007, when the Department of Corrections and attorneys representing prisoners began hammering out a protocol for executions. Tuesday’s filing claims that the protocol has been changed numerous times, most recently in January, and that the department has not been able to adhere to it.

In February, for example, the department switched from a three-drug to a one-drug protocol two days before an execution because it discovered that one of the other required drugs had passed its expiration date. In March, a federal judge ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had illegally allowed Arizona and other states to import death-penalty drugs from England in 2010 and 2011.

Among the ongoing issues have been the backgrounds and qualifications of the medical staff who perform the executions, and their repeated use of a catheter that is surgically implanted in an artery in the prisoner’s groin.

“I’m astounded that Arizona is the only state that has to perform surgery to carry out an execution,” said Assistant Federal Public Defender Dale Baich.

In a memorandum accompanying Tuesday’s motion for preliminary injunction, Baich noted that the so-called femoral catheter was used in the February execution of Robert Towery and the April execution of Thomas Kemp, even though autopsies showed that both men had suitable veins for easy catheter insertion in their arms.

Towery, the memorandum said, was stuck 11 times in his arms, wrist and groin before the execution doctor succeeded in inserting a catheter in his groin. The process requires a long needle that threads a wire into the vein, along which a plastic tube is slid, followed by the catheter itself, which is stitched or stapled into place.

Towery also asked to speak to Baich, his lawyer, during the time the surgery was being performed, but was denied, the memorandum says.

In his motion, Baich asked the court to stop the Lopez execution and allow time to further argue the protocol lapses.

Read more:

Number of People Executed in 2013

16 (as of 6/17/13)

Number of People Executed Since 1976

U.S.
1,336

Ninth Circuit States
71 (5.25%)

Number of People on Death Row in Ninth Circuit States (As of April, 2012)

Number of People on Death Row in Ninth Circuit States (As of October 1st, 2012)

Sourced total U.S. number from NAACP LDF, October 1, 2012.

994 (31.6% of U.S. death row population: 3,148)

Race of Defendant:
White: 426 (42.8%)
Black: 317 (31.9%)
Latino: 200 (20.1%)
Native American: 4 (0.4%)
Asian: 26 (2.6%)
Unknown: 21 (2.1%)

Gender:
Male: 970 (97.6%)
Female: 24 (2.4%)

Twitter

Disclaimer

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. Please do not send any confidential information to the Oregon Justice Resource Center until you have received written acceptance from the Oregon Justice Resource Center of any legal services of any legal services you may request. Please do not reveal, discuss, or post any information about your case or legal problems in the comments section or any where else on this blog. Any communication with the Oregon Justice Resource Center through this blog does not create an attorney client relationship and your communications are not protected.

The owners of this blog reserve the right to delete any comment or post at any time for any reason. This blog is maintained by the Oregon Justice Resource Center and unless it is explicitly stated otherwise, this blog expresses only the views and opinions of the Oregon Justice Resource Center.

For more information visit our website: http://ojrc.org/

%d bloggers like this: